4.3 Article

Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Significantly Increases Serum Lipoprotein Lipase Level in Obese Patients

期刊

OBESITY FACTS
卷 12, 期 3, 页码 357-368

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000500360

关键词

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy; Lipoprotein lipase; Nonsurgical treatment; Obesity; Preheparin serum

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: Obesity is one of the causes of metabolic disorders. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) confers beneficial effects not only on body weight (BW) but also on metabolic disorders. The lipoprotein lipase (LPL) level in preheparin serum is associated with visceral adipose tissue and reflects insulin resistance. However, the change in serum preheparin LPL levels after LSG remains unclear. This study aimed to examine the effect of LSG on preheparin LPL level in obese patients compared with nonsurgical treatment. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed a total of 100 obese patients who were treated for obesity and had preheparin LPL levels measured before and 12 months after LSG or after 12 months of nonsurgical treatment. Fifty-six patients received LSG (LSG group), and 44 patients had no surgical treatment (nonsurgical group). We compared clinical parameters such as body mass index (BMI), hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)), and preheparin LPL level before and 12 months after treatment. Results: BMI and HbA(1c) decreased significantly in both groups, but decreases in both parameters were greater in the LSG group than in the nonsurgical group. Estimated glomerular filtration was significantly improved only in the LSG group. Preheparin LPL level increased significantly only in the LSG group (from 45.8 +/- 21.6 to 75.0 +/- 34.9 ng/mL, p < 0.001). Multiple regression identified LSG and decreased BMI as independent predictors of preheparin LPL level increase. Conclusions: These results suggest that LSG independently increases preheparin LPL level beyond BW reduction in obese patients. (C) 2019 The Author(s) Published by S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据