4.7 Article

Low-Temperature Performance of a Ferroelectric Glass Electrolyte Rechargeable Cell

期刊

ACS APPLIED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 2, 期 7, 页码 4943-4953

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsaem.9b00616

关键词

electrochemical cell; low temperature; ferroelectric; Li-glass electrolyte; ionic conductivity; dielectric constant; electrochemical cycling

资金

  1. Robert A. Welch Foundation, Houston, Texas [F-1066]
  2. FCT-Portuguese project [PTDC/CTM-ENE/2391/2014]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An electrochemical cell that powers all-electric road vehicles will likely have an alkali-metal anode and the ability to operate down to -20 degrees C. The traditional all-solid-state batteries can only perform well at temperatures above room temperature. We have shown elsewhere that an alkali-metal negative electrode can be plated dendrite free from a ferroelectric amorphous-oxide (glass) Li+ or Na+ electrolyte having a room-temperature Li+ or Na+ conductivity sigma(i) approximate to 2.5 x 10(-2) S cm(-1) which is similar to that of a liquid electrolyte. Here, it is demonstrated that the ionic conductivity of the electrolyte is sigma(i) approximate to 10(-2) S cm(-1) at -20 degrees C after optimization, and the dielectric constant is epsilon'(r) approximate to 6 X 10(5) at -35 degrees C. Moreover, it is shown that the remanent polarization of the ferroelectric-electrolyte (polarization at zero potential) adds to the capacity of the cell. The electrochemical cycling performances between -35 and 25 degrees C of the Li+-glass electrolyte in gold and lithium symmetric cells and in full cells are presented. Furthermore, it is shown that a coin-cell with the ferroelectric Li-glass electrolyte at -35 degrees C with output current of 56 mu A cm(-2) can light a red LED at 1.5 V. Finally, it is concluded that the Li+-glass electrolyte performs very well in symmetric cells and performs reasonably well down to -20 degrees C in asymmetric cells that also rely on the performance of the cathode and on the electrolyte/cathode interface.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据