3.8 Article

Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasound Biopsy Needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Liver Biopsy

期刊

CLINICAL ENDOSCOPY
卷 52, 期 4, 页码 347-352

出版社

KOREAN SOC GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY
DOI: 10.5946/ce.2019.005

关键词

Endoscopic ultrasonography; Fine-needle biopsy; Liver

资金

  1. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health [UL1 TR001860]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background/Aims: To compare the performance of latest commercially available endoscopic ultrasound biopsy needles. Methods: Six latest commercially available needles were tested on a freshly harvested bovine liver; the tested needles included three 19 G, one 20 G, and two 22 G needles. Five biopsies were performed per needle with 10 mL of wet suction. The primary outcome was the number of complete portal tracts (CPTs) per needle aspirate. The secondary outcomes were the mean specimen length and mean fragment length. Analysis of variance and Tukey's test were applied. Results: All 19 G needles and the 20 G needle yielded similar mean CPTs and were superior to the SharkCore 22 G needle (p< 0.001 adjusted for multiplicity). There was no statistically significant difference in total specimen length among the three 19 G needles and the 20 G needle tested. The two 22 G needles performed similarly with respect to the number of CPTs, mean fragment length, and mean specimen length (adjusted p=0.07, p=0.59, and p=0.10, respectively). Conclusions: The specimen adequacy was similar among the 3 latest commercially available 19 G needles. The endoscopist may choose a larger- bore needle based on availability without concerns of specimen adequacy. Further studies are needed to assess the ease of needle use in various anatomical locations and to confirm the optimal needle design.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据