4.7 Review

Effect of chronic consumption of pistachios (Pistacia vera L.) on glucose metabolism in pre-diabetics and type 2 diabetics: A systematic review

期刊

CRITICAL REVIEWS IN FOOD SCIENCE AND NUTRITION
卷 59, 期 7, 页码 1115-1123

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2017.1392290

关键词

Unsaturated fatty acids; Carotenoids; MicroRNAs; Pistachio; Polyphenols; Insulin resistance

资金

  1. Fundacao de Amparoa Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG, Brazil)
  2. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Ensino Superior (CAPES, Brazil)
  3. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq, Brazil)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pistachio is a nut with high polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA), polyphenols and carotenoids content, and the synergism between these compounds appears to affect glucose metabolism. In this systematic review we analyzed studies in which the effect of chronic consumption of pistachio on markers of glucose metabolism was evaluated in pre-diabetic and type 2 diabetics. We used the PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane and Lilacs databases. The research terms used were pistachio, pre-diabetes, type 2 diabetes mellitus, insulin resistance, blood glucose, hyperglycemia and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). Four articles were selected, of which three tested the intake of 50 to 57g of pistachio/day and one 20% of the daily caloric intake, for a period of 1 to 4months. Studies reported a decrease in fasting blood glucose, insulinemia, HOMA-IR, and fructosamine, but no change in HbA1c. Lower concentrations of miR-192 and miR-375 were also found, which correlated positively with HOMA-IR. The synergism between PUFA, MUFA, polyphenols and carotenoids present in pistachios can modulate specific miRNA, increasing insulin sensitivity through the PI3K-AKT signaling pathway. This modulation can be used as a tool to monitor the response to interventions, favoring the prevention and treatment of complications related to diabetes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据