4.8 Article

Origin of the Size-Dependent Stokes Shift in CsPbBr3 Perovskite Nanocrystals

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 139, 期 35, 页码 12201-12208

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b05683

关键词

-

资金

  1. Division of Materials Sciences and Engineering, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, U.S. Department of Energy [DE-SC0014334]
  2. Arthur J. Schmitt Fellowship Foundation
  3. NSF Graduate Research Fellowship [DGE-131358]
  4. Patrick and Jana Eilers Graduate Student Fellowship for Energy Related Research
  5. University of Notre Dame's College of Science
  6. Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry
  7. ND Energy
  8. Honeywell Corporation
  9. University of Notre Dame Integrated Imaging Facility
  10. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0014334] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The origin of the size-dependent Stokes shift in CsPbBr3 nanocrystals (NCs) is explained for the first time. Stokes shifts range from 82 to 20 meV for NCs with effective edge lengths varying from similar to 4 to 13 nm. We show that the Stokes shift is intrinsic to the NC electronic structure and does not arise from extrinsic effects such as residual ensemble size distributions, impurities, or solvent-related effects. The origin of the Stokes shift is elucidated via first-principles calculations. Corresponding theoretical modeling of the CsPbBr3 NC density of states and band structure reveals the existence of an intrinsic confined hole state 260 to 70 meV above the valence band edge state for NCs with edge lengths from similar to 2 to 5 nm. A size-dependent Stokes shift is therefore predicted and is in quantitative agreement with the experimental data. Comparison between bulk and NC calculations shows that the confined hole state is exclusive to NCs. At a broader level, the distinction between absorbing and emitting states in CsPbBr3 is likely a general feature of other halide perovskite NCs and can be tuned via NC size to enhance applications involving these materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据