4.8 Article

Turn on of sky-blue thermally activated delayed fluorescence and circularly polarized luminescence (CPL) via increased torsion by a bulky carbazolophane donor

期刊

CHEMICAL SCIENCE
卷 10, 期 27, 页码 6689-6696

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9sc01821b

关键词

-

资金

  1. EPSRC [EP/P010482/1, EP/R035164/1, EP/L017008/1]
  2. University of St Andrews
  3. DFG [SFB1176]
  4. KSOP
  5. cluster of excellence (3DMM2O)
  6. JST-ERATO [JPMJER1305]
  7. JSPS Core-to-Core Program
  8. EPSRC [EP/P010482/1, EP/R035164/1, EP/L017008/1, EP/J01771X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The carbazolophane (Czp) donor unit (indolo[2.2]paracyclophane) is introduced to the design pool of donors in thermally activated delayed fluorescence emitters. The increased steric bulk of the annelated donor unit forces an increased torsion between the carbazole and the aryl bridge resulting in a decreased Delta E-ST and an enhancement of the thermally activated delayed fluorescence in the triazine-containing emitter CzpPhTrz. Further, the closely stacked carbazole and benzene units of the paracyclophane show through-space pi-pi interactions, effectively increasing the spatial occupation for the HOMO orbital. The chiroptical properties of enantiomers of [2.2]paracyclophane reveal mirror image circular dichroism (CD) and circularly polarized luminescence (CPL) with g(lum) of 1.3 x 10(-3). rac-CzpPhTrz is a sky-blue emitter with lambda(PL) of 480 nm, a very small Delta E-ST of 0.16 eV and high Phi(PL) of 70% in 10 wt% doped DPEPO films. Sky blue-emitting OLEDs were fabricated with this new TADF emitter showing a high maximum EQE of 17% with CIE coordinates of (0.17, 0.25). A moderate EQE roll-off was also observed with an EQE of 12% at a display relevant luminance of 100 cd m(-2). Our results show that the Czp donor contributes to both a decreased Delta E-ST and an increased photoluminescence quantum yield, both advantageous in the molecular design of TADF emitters.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据