4.8 Article

Structural and Mechanistic Differences in Mixed-Linker Zeolitic Imidazolate Framework Synthesis by Solvent Assisted Linker Exchange and de Novo Routes

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 139, 期 16, 页码 5906-5915

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b01660

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF-CBET) [1264874]
  2. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  3. Directorate For Engineering [1264874] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mixed-linker zeolitic imidazolate frameworks (ZIFs) are a subclass of metal organic frameworks (MOFs) amenable to significant property tuning by altering the functional groups on the imidazolate linkers. Solvent assisted linker exchange (SALE) and de novo synthesis of mixed linker ZIFs have been demonstrated, but the differences in structural properties most importantly the linker distributions and synthesis mechanisms of these two different types of hybrid ZIFs are unknown. In this work, a combination of H-1 NMR combined rotation and multiple pulse spectroscopy (CRAMPS), water adsorption, and nitrogen measurements reveal distinct differences in linker mixing between SALE and de novo ZIF-8-90 hybrids. Native-fluorescence confocal microscopy is shown to provide a direct means to visualize these differences. The effects of crystal size, temperature, and SALE duration were studied in detail, and a generalizable mechanism for SALE processes in ZIFs is proposed. The SALE process is found to follow a diffusion-limited behavior leading to core shell morphologies. Under harsher SALE conditions, deviations from diffusion-limited behavior are found due to etching and partial dissolution of the initial ZIF-8 crystals. With the selection of appropriate reaction conditions, SALE processes appear to be capable of generating controlled core shell ZIF structures of good morphological quality that complement the well-mixed structures obtained by de novo methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据