4.8 Article

Mesoporous Tungsten Oxides with Crystalline Framework for Highly Sensitive and Selective

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 139, 期 30, 页码 10365-10373

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b04221

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF of China [51372041, 51422202, 51432004]
  2. Shu Guang Project by Shanghai Municipal Education Commission [13SG02]
  3. Shanghai Education Development Foundation
  4. Shanghai Sci. & Tech. Committee [14JC1400700]
  5. Youth Top-notch Talent Support Program of China
  6. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [KLH1615138]
  7. Shanghai Nature Science Foundation of China [14ZR1416600]
  8. State Key Laboratory of Transducer Technology of China [SKT1503]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Foodborne pathogens like Listeria monocytogenes can cause various illnesses and pose a serious threat to public health. They produce species-specific microbial volatile organic compounds, i.e., the biomarkers, making it possible to indirectly measure microbial contamination in foodstuff. Herein, highly ordered mesoporous tungsten oxides with high surface areas and tunable pores have been synthesized and used as sensing materials to achieve an exceptionally sensitive and selective detection of trace Listeria monocytogenes. The mesoporous WO3-based chemiresistive sensors exhibit a rapid response, superior sensitivity, and highly selective detection of 3-hydroxy-2-butanone. The chemical mechanism study reveals that acetic acid is the main product generated by the surface catalytic reaction of the biomarker molecule over mesoporous WO3. Furthermore, by using the mesoporous WO3-based sensors, a rapid bacteria detection was achieved, with a high sensitivity, a linear relationship in a broad range, and a high specificity for Listeria monocytogenes. Such a good gas sensing performance foresees the great potential application of mesoporous WO3-based sensors for fast and effective detection of microbial contamination for the safety of food, water safety and public health.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据