4.1 Review

A survey on computer vision techniques for detecting facial features towards the early diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment in the elderly

期刊

SYSTEMS SCIENCE & CONTROL ENGINEERING
卷 7, 期 1, 页码 252-263

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/21642583.2019.1647577

关键词

Facial features analysis; cognitive impairment; computer vision techniques; literature review

资金

  1. CAPITA plc in Strathclyde's Strategic Technology Partnership (STP) Programme - Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/N011074/1]
  2. Royal Society in Newton Advanced Fellowship [NA160342]
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/M506643/1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the UK, more and more people are suffering from various kinds of cognitive impairment. Its early detection and diagnosis can be of great importance. However, it is challenging to detect cognitive impairment in the early stage with high accuracy and low costs. Some currently popular methods include cognitive tests and neuroimaging techniques which have their own drawbacks. Whilst viewing videos, studies have shown that the facial expressions of people with cognitive impairment exhibit abnormal corrugator activities compared to those without cognitive impairment. The aim of this paper is to explore promising computer vision and pattern analysis techniques in the case of detecting cognitive impairment through facial expression analysis. This paper presents a survey of computer vision techniques to detect facial features for early diagnosis of cognitive impairment. Additionally, this paper reviews and compares the advantages and disadvantages of such techniques. Automatic facial expression analysis has the potential to be used for cognitive impairment detection in the elderly. In the case of detecting cognitive impairment through facial expression analysis, it may be better to use a local method of facial components alignment, and employ static approaches in facial feature extraction and facial feature classification.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据