4.8 Article

Melting Proteins: Evidence for Multiple Stable Structures upon Thermal Denaturation of Native Ubiquitin from Ion Mobility Spectrometry-Mass Spectrometry Measurements

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 139, 期 18, 页码 6306-6309

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b02774

关键词

-

资金

  1. Waters Corporation
  2. National Institutes of Health [R01 GM103725-02, R21NS094882, DP2GM123486]
  3. U.S. Department of energy [DE-FG02-04ER15320]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ion mobility and mass spectrometry techniques are coupled with a temperature-controlled electrospray ionization source to follow the structural transitions of ubiquitin in aqueous solution (pH = 3) at elevated solution temperatures (T = 26-96 degrees C). Changes in the charge state distribution are consistent with a two-state, cooperative unfolding transition having a melting temperature of T-m = 71 +/- 2 degrees C, in agreement with prior measurements [Wintrode, P. L.; Makhatadze, G. I.; Privalov, P. L. Proteins, 1994, 18, 246-253]. However, analysis of ion mobility distributions reveals the two-state transition is a composite of transitions involving at least nine unique species: three native or native-like structures; two that appear to be equilibrium intermediates (i.e., populations of new conformers that form at elevated temperatures but subsequently disappear at higher temperatures); and four products observed at high temperatures, including the well-characterized ubiquitin A state, and two solution species that are differentiated based on a cis- or trans-configured Glum-Pro peptide bond. These nine states vary in abundances by factors as large as similar to 10(3) over the range of solution temperatures. Although experimental melting transitions are conceived as a loss of well-defined structure leading to a random distribution of unstructured, denatured forms, the results provide evidence for new conformers having at least some well-defined structural elements are stabilized as temperature is increased.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据