4.6 Article

Comparative Analysis of Channel Models for Industrial IoT Wireless Communication

期刊

IEEE ACCESS
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 91627-91640

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2927217

关键词

3GPP channel loss models; cell radius; industrial IoT; outage probability; spectral efficiency

资金

  1. Academy of Finland [313039]
  2. Academy of Finland (AKA) [313039, 313039] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the industrial environments of the future, robots, sensors, and other industrial devices will have to communicate autonomously and in a robust and efficient manner with each other, relying on a large extent on wireless communication links, which will expand and supplement the existing wired/Ethernet connections. The wireless communication links suffer from various channel impairments, such as attenuations due to path losses, random fluctuations due to shadowing and fading effects over the channel and the non line-of-sight (NLoS) due to obstacles on the communication path. Several channel models exist to model the industrial environments in indoor, urban, or rural areas, but a comprehensive comparison of their characteristics is still missing from the current literature. Moreover, several IoT technologies are already on the market, many competing with each other for future possible services and applications in Industrial IoT (IIoT) environments. This paper aims at giving a survey of existing wireless channel models applicable to the IIoT context and to compare them for the first time in terms of worst-case, median-case, and best-case predictive behaviors. Performance metrics, such as cell radius, spectral efficiency, and outage probability, are investigated with a focus on three long-range IoT technologies, one medium-range, and one short-range IoT technology as selected case studies. A summary of popular IoT technologies and their applicability to industrial scenarios is addressed as well.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据