4.7 Article

Energy poverty and social relations: A capabilities approach

期刊

ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE
卷 55, 期 -, 页码 227-235

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2019.05.002

关键词

Energy poverty; Social relations; Capabilities; Secondary qualitative data analysis

资金

  1. White Rose Collaboration Fund
  2. UK Energy Research Centre [EP/L024756/1]
  3. UK Energy Research Centre (Carbon Crucible)
  4. National Institute for Health Research [PB -PG-0408-16041]
  5. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EPSRC EP/K011723/1]
  6. Energy Savings Trust [M47]
  7. Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care for South Yorkshire
  8. Foundations Independent Living Trust Ltd
  9. EAGA Charitable Trust
  10. Chesshire Lehmann Fund
  11. National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR) [PB-PG-0408-16041] Funding Source: National Institutes of Health Research (NIHR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Energy poverty is widely understood to be a complex and multi-faceted problem, with a range of drivers. In this paper we draw on secondary qualitative data on energy poverty from the UK, as well as conceptual thinking informed by the capabilities approach, to explore a previously understudied facet of energy poverty: social relations. We focus particularly on how relationships with family, friends, agencies and distant others impact on people's ability to cope with energy poverty. We find that the connection between social relations and energy poverty is recursive: good social relations can both enable access to energy services, and be a product of such access. This connection is also shaped by structural factors, such as access to a range of resources, membership of particular collectivities, the need to perform social roles, and the common reasons used to explain poverty and energy use. Our work suggests that attempts to address energy poverty need to take into account the quality of people's social relations, as well as the potential impact of policy and practice on social relations, given that people rely on their friends and families for information support and advice, on key agency workers for access to resources, and are also constrained by discourses of poverty.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据