4.2 Article

Understanding Pathways Between PTSD, Homelessness, and Substance Use Among Adolescents

期刊

PSYCHOLOGY OF ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS
卷 33, 期 5, 页码 467-476

出版社

EDUCATIONAL PUBLISHING FOUNDATION-AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/adb0000488

关键词

addiction treatment; substance use; posttraumatic stress disorder; homelessness; adolescents

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Youth experiencing homelessness have been shown to experience high levels of both trauma and substance use. However, prior work has yet to consider how substance use, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, and homelessness are temporally, or reciprocally, associated over time. The current study uses symptom-driven and experience-driven models to examine the reciprocal relationships between substance use, PTSD symptoms, and homelessness among a large sample of adolescents receiving substance use treatment in the United States. Adolescents (n = 20,069; M-age = 15.6; 74% male) completed baseline, 3-, 6-, and 12-month assessments. Autoregressive latent trajectory with structured residual (ALT-SR) models were used to examine within- and between-person relationships. We found continued support for prior work at the between-person level of analysis. At the within-person level, during the treatment phase, PTSD emerged as a key mechanism predicting both return to use and increased days of homelessness posttreatment. Further. greater substance use at treatment completion was associated with greater PTSD symptoms and homelessness. prospectively. The current study extends the previous work to consider individual level processes in conjunction with overarching event level predictors of homelessness. We found that PTSD symptomology is a driving factor that influences, both directly and indirectly, experiences of homelessness posttreatment. Interventions may wish to incorporate trauma informed approaches for youth entering treatment as this may mitigate long-term experiences of homelessness and return to substance use.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据