4.1 Article

The Coparenting Relationship Scale-Father's Prenatal Version

期刊

JOURNAL OF ADULT DEVELOPMENT
卷 26, 期 3, 页码 201-208

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10804-018-9308-y

关键词

Coparenting Relationship Scale; Psychometric characteristics; Pregnancy; Fathers; Depressive and anxious symptoms; Adult attachment; Partner's relationship quality

资金

  1. Psychology Research Centre, University of Minho [UID/PSI/01662/2013]
  2. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology
  3. Portuguese Ministry of Education and Science
  4. FEDER through COMPETE2020 under the PT2020 Partnership Agreement [POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007653]
  5. FEDER Funds through the Programa Operacional Factores de Competitividade - COMPETE
  6. National Funds through FCT - Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia [PTDC/SAU/SAP/116738/2010]
  7. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/SAU-SAP/116738/2010] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to examine the psychometric characteristics of the Coparenting Relationship Scale when administered in fathers during pregnancy. During the first trimester of a partner's pregnancy, 91 primiparous fathers completed the Coparenting Relationship Scale-Father's Prenatal Version (CRS-FPV), and self-report measures of depressive and anxious symptoms, adult attachment, and partner's relationship quality. The CRS-FPV revealed good internal consistency. Exploratory factor analysis revealed four factors: lack of coparenting support, coparenting conflict, coparenting disagreement, and coparenting undermining. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed a good model fit. Significant associations between the CRS-FPV and the original CRS subscales were found. Hypothesized associations between the CRS-FPV subscales and individual (depressive and anxious symptoms and adult attachment) and dyadic (partner's relationship quality) constructs were also significant. The present study suggested that the CRS-FPV is a reliable multidimensional measure to assess coparenting in fathers during pregnancy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据