4.6 Article

Cancer risks and survival in patients with multiple primary melanomas: Association with family history of melanoma and germline CDKN2A mutation status

期刊

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.05.050

关键词

cancer risk; CDKN2A; familial melanoma; multiple primary melanoma; mutation testing; survival

资金

  1. Swedish Cancer Society [CAN 2013/637, CAN 2014/851]
  2. Radiumhemmet research fund [144073]
  3. regional and hospital funds in Lund and Stockholm

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Worse outcomes have been noted in patients with multiple primary melanomas (MPMs) than in patients with single primary melanomas. Objective: We investigated how family history of melanoma and germline CDKN2A mutation status of MPM patients affects risks of developing subsequent melanomas and other cancers and survival outcomes. Methods: Comprehensive data on cancer diagnoses and deaths of MPM patients, their first-degree relatives, and matched controls were obtained through Swedish national health care and population registries. Results: Familial MPM cases with germline CDKN2A mutations were youngest at the diagnosis of their second melanoma (median age 42 years) and had among the MPM cohorts the highest relative risks (RR) compared to controls of developing >2 melanomas (RR 238.4, 95% CI 74.8-759.9). CDKN2A mutated MPM cases and their first-degree relatives were the only cohorts with increased risks of nonskin cancers compared to controls (RR 3.6, 95% CI 1.9-147.1 and RR 3.2, 95% CI 1.9-5.6, respectively). In addition, CDKN2A mutated MPM cases had worse survival compared with both cases with familial (HR 3.0, 95% CI 1.3-8.1) and sporadic wild-type MPM (HR 2.63, 95% CI 1.3-5.4). Limitations: Our study examined outcomes in subgroups of MPM patients, which affected the sample size of the study groups. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that CDKN2A mutation status and family history ofmelanoma significantly affects outcomes of MPM patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据