4.6 Article

Quantification and isotherm modelling of competitive phosphate and silicate adsorption onto micro-sized granular ferric hydroxide

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 9, 期 41, 页码 23642-23651

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9ra04865k

关键词

-

资金

  1. German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) within the framework of the German-Israeli Water Technology Cooperation [02WIL1389]
  2. German Research Foundation
  3. Open Access Publication Fund of TU Berlin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adsorption onto ferric hydroxide is a known method to reach very low residual phosphate concentrations. Silicate is omnipresent in surface and industrial waters and reduces the adsorption capacity of ferric hydroxides. The present article focusses on the influences of silicate concentration and contact time on the adsorption of phosphate to a micro-sized iron hydroxide adsorbent (mu GFH) and fits adsorption data to multi-component adsorption isotherms. In Berlin drinking water (DOC of approx. 4 mg L-1) at pH 7.0, loadings of 24 mg g(-1) P (with 3 mg L-1 initial PO43--P) and 17 mg L-1 Si (with 9 mg L-1 initial Si) were reached. In deionized water, phosphate shows a high percentage of reversible bonds to mu GFH while silicate adsorption is not reversible probably due to polymerization. Depending on the initial silicate concentration, phosphate loadings are reduced by 27, 33 and 47% (for equilibrium concentrations of 1.5 mg L-1) for 9, 14 and 22 mg L-1 Si respectively. Out of eight tested multi-component adsorption models, the Extended Freundlich Model Isotherm (EFMI) describes the simultaneous adsorption of phosphate and silicate best. Thus, providing the means to predict and control phosphate removal. Longer contact times of the adsorbent with silicate prior to addition of phosphate reduce phosphate adsorption significantly. Compared to 7 days of contact with silicate (c(0) = 10 mg L-1) prior to phosphate (c(0) = 3 mg L-1) addition, 28 and 56 days reduce the mu GFH capacity for phosphate by 21 and 43%, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据