4.4 Article

Bumblebees adjust protein and lipid collection rules to the presence of brood

期刊

CURRENT ZOOLOGY
卷 65, 期 4, 页码 437-446

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/cz/zoz026

关键词

artificial diets; Bombus terrestris; bumble bees; nutritional geometry; rule of compromise

类别

资金

  1. CNRS
  2. Passerelle Grant of the Research Center on Animal Cognition
  3. CIFRE PhD thesis (CNRS-Koppert)
  4. Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-16-CE02-0002-01]
  5. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-16-CE02-0002] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Animals have evolved foraging strategies to acquire blends of nutrients that maximize fitness traits. In social insects, nutrient regulation is complicated by the fact that few individuals, the foragers, must address the divergent nutritional needs of all colony members simultaneously, including other workers, the reproductives, and the brood. Here we used 3D nutritional geometry design to examine how bumblebee workers regulate their collection of 3 major macronutrients in the presence and absence of brood. We provided small colonies artificial nectars (liquid diets) and pollens (solid diets) varying in their compositions of proteins, lipids, and carbohydrates during 2 weeks. Colonies given a choice between nutritionally complementary diets self-selected foods to reach a target ratio of 71% proteins, 6% carbohydrates, and 23% lipids, irrespective of the presence of brood. When confined to a single nutritionally imbalanced solid diet, colonies without brood regulated lipid collection and over-collected protein relative to this target ratio, whereas colonies with brood regulated both lipid and protein collection. This brood effect on the regulation of nutrient collection by workers suggests that protein levels are critical for larval development. Our results highlight the importance of considering bee nutrition as a multidimensional phenomenon to better assess the effects of environmental impoverishment and malnutrition on population declines.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据