4.1 Article

In vivo antiplasmodial potential of three herbal methanolic extracts in mice infected with Plasmodium berghei NK65

期刊

CHINESE HERBAL MEDICINES
卷 11, 期 3, 页码 299-307

出版社

ELSEVIER SINGAPORE PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chmed.2019.06.002

关键词

Aegle marmelos L.; Aristolochia indica L.; Cassia auriculata L.; GC-MS; histopathology; in vivo antiplasmodial potential; Plasmodium berghei (NK65); Swiss albino mice

资金

  1. Department of Science & Technology, Science & Engineering Research Board (SERB), New Delhi, India [PDF/2016/0 0 0496]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The present study deals with the investigation of antiplasmodial potential of leaf methanolic extract of Aegle marmelos, Aristolochia indica and Cassia auriculata against Plasmodium berghei (NK65) infected mice. Methods: The chloroquine-sensitive parasites P. berghei (1 x 10(6)) were inoculated into Swiss albino mice intraperitoneally. The methanol extracts of three herbal plants were orally administered in P. berghei infected mice which were further assessed using the four-day suppressive test at different doses of 150, 300 and 600 mg/kg per day. Chloroquine (CQ) was used as the standard drug with of 1.25, 2.5 and 5 mg/kg concentrations and was orally administered. Results: The leaves of A. marmelos, A. indica, and C. auriculata were found to suppress P. berghei parasitaemia in Swiss albino mice by (67.0 +/- 4.02)%, (72.0 +/- 8.44)% and (52.7 +/- 2.06)% at 600 mg/kg/d with ED 50 values of 284.73, 233.77 and 562.48 mg/kg, respectively. These herbal plants increased the mean survival time of infected mice and prevented body weight loss. GC-MS analysis revealed the presence of hentriacontan-16-one (C31H62O) in A. indica extract. The histopathology study showed non-toxic to kidney and liver at 600 mg/kg/body weight. Conclusions: Overall results revealed that herbal plants may be active in the development of novel and cheap antimalarial compounds. (C) 2019 Tianjin Press of Chinese Herbal Medicines. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据