4.1 Article

Maternal depression and infant attachment security: A meta-analysis

期刊

INFANT MENTAL HEALTH JOURNAL
卷 40, 期 6, 页码 817-834

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/imhj.21812

关键词

attachment; child development; depression; meta-analysis; mother-infant relations

资金

  1. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
  2. University of Manitoba
  3. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) Joseph-Armand Bombardier Canada Graduate Scholarships Program: Master's Scholarship
  4. Psychology Department, University of Manitoba
  5. Faculty of Graduate Studies Tri-Council Top-Up Award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this study is to clarify the magnitude of the association between maternal depression and infant attachment nonsecurity, and to identify possible moderators of this relationship. An extensive literature search was conducted using multiple databases of both published and unpublished studies. A meta-analysis was conducted to determine the relationship between maternal depression and infant attachment security and to establish the effect size. The main findings from this meta-analysis, which included 42 studies, indicate that there is a small, yet significant, relationship between maternal depression and infant attachment nonsecurity. The rate of nonsecurity in infants of mothers with depression was approximately 20% higher than expected rates in a nonclinical population, and the association between depressive symptoms and nonsecurity was small, but significant. Infants of mothers with depression were nearly twice as likely to have a nonsecure attachment than were infants of healthy mothers. Depression measure and maternal sample source were identified as significant moderators of the odds ratio effect size. Results of this study demonstrate that there is a significant relationship between maternal depression and infant attachment nonsecurity, and suggest that interventions that focus on both maternal mental health and the attachment relationship are warranted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据