4.6 Article

Effects of energy-level offset between a donor and acceptor on the photovoltaic performance of non-fullerene organic solar cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 7, 期 32, 页码 18889-18897

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9ta04789a

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51673201, 91633301, 21835006, 21734008, 51961135103]
  2. Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB12030200]
  3. Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences [BNLMS-CXXM-201903]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Minimizing the energy-level offset between a donor and acceptor in order to reduce energy loss (E-loss) is a hot topic in the field of organic solar cells (OSCs). However, for non-fullerene OSCs, the discussion concerning the relationship between energy-level offset and device performance has not yet reached a general conclusion due to their complex molecular structure and wide variety of photoactive materials. This study consists of a systematic investigation of this issue based on a typical polymer donor PBDB-TF and a series of A-D-A-type aromatic hybrid fused-ring electron acceptors with various energy levels. We investigate the charge separation of all devices and build the relationship between E-loss, exciton dissociation efficiency (P-diss) and energy-level offset. We find that in large Delta LUMO cases, E-loss and P-diss are positively correlated with Delta HOMO. Larger Delta HOMO could provide sufficient driving force for more efficient exciton dissociation, and thus, higher power conversion efficiency (PCE) in the corresponding non-fullerene OSCs. When Delta HOMO is below a particular threshold, the exciton dissociation process could be hindered severely, thereby deteriorating device performance. Therefore, sufficient driving force is still necessary for efficient exciton dissociation in PBDB-TF-based non-fullerene OSCs in order to achieve outstanding photovoltaic performance. The particular threshold for efficient exciton dissociation needs to be determined in future research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据