4.6 Article

p-Doping of organic hole transport layers in p-i-n perovskite solar cells: correlating open-circuit voltage and photoluminescence quenching

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 7, 期 32, 页码 18971-18979

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9ta03896e

关键词

-

资金

  1. Stephen and Ana Hui Fellowship (Imperial College London)
  2. China Scholarship Council
  3. Welsh government Ser Cymru Solar programme
  4. GIST Research Institute (GRI) - GIST
  5. Global Research Laboratory Program of the National Research Foundation (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning [NRF-2017K1A1A2013153]
  6. GIST-ICL International Collaboration RD Centre
  7. EPSRC Centre for Doctoral Training in Plastic Electronic Materials [EP/L016702/1]
  8. Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning, Republic of Korea [GIST-14] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Doping is a widely implemented strategy for enhancing the inherent electronic properties of charge transport layers in photovoltaic (PV) devices. Here, in direct contrast to existing understanding, we find that a reduction in p-doping of the organic hole transport layer (HTL) leads to substantial improvements in PV performance in planar p-i-n perovskite solar cells (PSCs), driven by improvements in open circuit voltage (V-OC). Employing a range of transient and steady state characterisation tools, we find that the improvements of V-OC correlate with reduced surface recombination losses in less p-doped HTLs. A simple device model including screening of bulk electric fields in the perovskite layer is used to explain this observation. In particular, photoluminescence (PL) emission of complete solar cells shows that efficient performance is correlated to a high PL intensity at open circuit and a low PL intensity at short circuit. We conclude that desirable transport layers for p-i-n PSCs should be charge selective contacts with low doping densities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据