4.5 Article

Genome-wide analysis of tandem repeats in Tribolium castaneum genome reveals abundant and highly dynamic tandem repeat families with satellite DNA features in euchromatic chromosomal arms

期刊

DNA RESEARCH
卷 22, 期 6, 页码 387-401

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/dnares/dsv021

关键词

Tandem repeats; euchromatic regions; evolutionary trends; transposition; Tribolium castaneum

资金

  1. Research Fund of Republic of Croatia [098-0982913-2756]
  2. European Union [316289 - InnoMol, FP7-REGPOT-2012-2013-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although satellite DNAs are well-explored components of heterochromatin and centromeres, little is known about emergence, dispersal and possible impact of comparably structured tandem repeats (TRs) on the genome-wide scale. Our bioinformatics analysis of assembled Tribolium castaneum genome disclosed significant contribution of TRs in euchromatic chromosomal arms and clear predominance of satellite DNA-typical 170 bp monomers in arrays of >= 5 repeats. By applying different experimental approaches, we revealed that the nine most prominent TR families Cast1-Cast9 extracted from the assembly comprise similar to 4.3% of the entire genome and reside almost exclusively in euchromatic regions. Among them, seven families that build similar to 3.9% of the genome are based on similar to 170 and similar to 340 bp long monomers. Results of phylogenetic analyses of 2500 monomers originating from these families show high-sequence dynamics, evident by extensive exchanges between arrays on non-homologous chromosomes. In addition, our analysis shows that concerted evolution acts more efficiently on longer than on shorter arrays. Efficient genome-wide distribution of nine TR families implies the role of transposition only in expansion of the most dispersed family, and involvement of other mechanisms is anticipated. Despite similarities in sequence features, FISH experiments indicate high-level compartmentalization of centromeric and euchromatic tandem repeats.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据