期刊
SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS
卷 41, 期 8, 页码 1585-1599出版社
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.12969
关键词
NHS; care; data; Informed consent; Big data; General practice; Medical records
资金
- European Commission [H2020-MSCA-IF-2014-659478]
- NIHR East Midlands CLAHRC
We draw on findings from qualitative interviews with health data researchers, GPs and citizens who opted out from NHS England's care.data programme to explore controversies and negotiations around data sharing in the NHS. Drawing on theoretical perspectives from science and technology studies, we show that the new socio-technical, ethical and economic arrangements were resisted not only on the basis of individual autonomy and protection from exploitation, but also as a collective effort to protect NHS services and patient data. We argue that the resulting opt-outs were a call for more personal control over data use. This was not because these citizens placed their personal interests above those of society. It was because they resisted proposed arrangements by networks of stakeholders, not seen as legitimate, to control flows and benefits of NHS patient data. Approaching informed consent this way helps us to explore resistance as a collective action for influencing the direction of such big data programmes towards the preservation of public access to healthcare as well as the distribution of ethical decision-making between independent, trustworthy institutions and individual citizens.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据