4.6 Article

The removal mechanism and performance of tetrabromobisphenol A with a novel multi-group activated carbon from recycling long-root Eichhornia crassipes plants

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 9, 期 43, 页码 24760-24769

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9ra03374b

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41771513, 51704121, 41001316, 51108262]
  2. Major Science and Technology Program for Water Pollution Control and Treatment in China [2017ZX07202006]
  3. Shanghai Pujiang Program [16PJ1404800]
  4. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFC1901000]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Long-root Eichhornia crassipes has shown great potential in eutrophication treatments while the heavy disposal of its plants limits its large-scale application. In this study, the adsorption of TBBPA by a novel multi-group activated carbon (MGAC), prepared from the reaped long-root Eichhornia crassipes plants has been investigated as a potential recycling and remediation technology. The MGAC showed great adsorption performance for aqueous TBBPA in that the adsorption could arrive at equilibrium in 4 h and the saturated adsorption capacities could reach up to 110.7, 110.5 and 75.50 mg g(-1) at 20, 30 and 40 degrees C, respectively. Based on the analysis of adsorption processes, it was confirmed that pi-pi interaction and hydrogen bonding were the major impetuses for the adsorption and the oxygen-containing functional groups on the MGAC surface could facilitate the adsorption by either electron sharing or electron transfer. In addition, the thermodynamic results showed that the adsorption was a spontaneous and exothermic reaction. Futhermore, the MGAC could be regenerated easily by 5% NaOH solution and retained over 50% of its initial capacities for TBBPA after 5 reprocessing cycles. These results indicate the promising application of MGAC in the wastewater treatment for TBBPA removal and a resource recycling method for the long-root Eichhornia crassipes plants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据