4.6 Article

A pilot study of pembrolizumab in smoldering myeloma: report of the clinical, immune, and genomic analysis

期刊

BLOOD ADVANCES
卷 3, 期 15, 页码 2400-2408

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019000300

关键词

-

资金

  1. Anderson Cancer Center Support Grant (National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute) [P30 CA016672]
  2. Leukemia and Lymphoma Society Specialized Center of Research (LLS SCOR)
  3. Dr Miriam and Sheldon G. Adelson Medical Research Foundation
  4. Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation
  5. University of Texas Anderson Moon Shot Program
  6. The trial collaborator (Merck)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multiple myeloma is, in most patients, an incurable cancer. Its precursors can be identified with routine tests setting the stage for early intervention to prevent active myeloma. We investigated the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab, an antiprogrammed cell death 1 antibody, in smoldering myeloma patients with intermediate/high risk of progression to symptomatic myeloma. Thirteen patients were treated with a median number of 8 cycles. One patient achieved a stringent complete response with bone marrow next-generation sequencing negativity at 10(-4) that is ongoing at 27 months (8%); 11 had stable disease (85%), and 1 progressed (8%). Three patients discontinued therapy due to immune-related adverse events: 2 with transaminitis and 1 due to tubulointerstitial nephritis. Immune profiling of bone marrow samples at baseline showed markers associated with a preexisting immune response in the responder compared with nonresponders and features of increased T-cell exhaustion in nonresponders. Consistent with this, transcriptome sequencing of bone marrow samples at baseline revealed an increased interferon-gamma signature in the responder compared with the nonresponders. In summary, our results suggest that smoldering myeloma may be immunogenic in a subset of patients, and therapies that enhance antitumor T-cell responses may be effective in preventing its progression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据