4.5 Article

Sub-seismic scale folding and thrusting within an exposed mass transport deposit: A case study from NW Argentina

期刊

JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY
卷 96, 期 -, 页码 176-191

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsg.2017.01.006

关键词

Mass transport deposit; Kinematic indicators; Imbricate thust-faults; Layer-normal shearing; Fold deformation; Sandstone blocks

资金

  1. CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico) - Brazil
  2. BG Brazil
  3. University of Aberdeen

向作者/读者索取更多资源

While imaging of mass transport deposits (MTDs) by seismic reflection techniques commonly reveals thrusts and large blocks that affect entire deposits, associated systems of folds are generally less apparent as they are typically below the limits of seismic resolution. However, such sub-seismic scale structures are important as they permit the direction of emplacement, gross kinematics and internal strain within MTDs to be determined. Here we present a rigorous description of two outcrop-scale MTDs exposed in La Pefia gorge, northwestern Argentina. These Carboniferous MTDs enable us to illustrate structural changes from a compressional domain, marked by sets of imbricated sandstone layers, into an extensional domain, characterized by sheared blocks of sandstone embedded in a finer matrix. Folds may be progressively modified during slump translation, resulting in asymmetric folds, which undergo subsequent deformation leading to sheared fold limbs together with detached and rotated fold hinges. In order to constrain transport directions within the MTDs, we measured fold hinges, mud clast alignment, and thrust planes as kinematic indicators. We propose emplacement models for both MTDs based on the overall deformational behaviour of sandstone beds during translation. The first model is based on the internal geometries and structures of a fault-dominated MTh, and the second model is based on layer normal shearing in a fold-dominated MTD. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据