4.5 Review

Domains and Measurements of Healthy Aging in Epidemiological Studies: A Review

期刊

GERONTOLOGIST
卷 59, 期 4, 页码 E294-E310

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/geront/gny029

关键词

Domain; Measurement; Healthy Aging

资金

  1. UCL Overseas Research Scholarship
  2. China Scholarship Council [201608060385]
  3. Economic and Social Research Council [ES-J019119/1]
  4. ESRC [ES/R008930/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of the Study: Few studies have recommended the essential domains of healthy aging and their relevant measurement to assess healthy aging comprehensively. This review is to fill the gap, by conducting a literature review of domains and measures of healthy aging in epidemiological studies. Design and Methods: A literature search was conducted up to March 31, 2017, supplemented by a search of references in all relevant articles in English. We made a final selection of 50 studies across 23 countries or regions. Results: Nineteen studies applied Rowe and Kahn's three standards to assess healthy aging. Thirty-seven studies measured physical capabilities mainly by (instrumental) activities of daily living. Cognitive functions were included in 33 studies. Nineteen of them applied Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Twenty-six studies considered metabolic and physiological health, but they mainly asked the self-reported absence of diseases. Twenty-four studies assessed psychological well-being by employing diverse scales. Questions about participation in social activities were mainly asked to measure social well-being in 22 studies. Sixteen studies considered individuals' general health status, which was mainly measured by self-rated health. Security questions were asked in five studies. Health behaviors were taken into account by three studies. Fifteen studies either applied SF-12/36 or developed health indices to assess healthy aging.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据