4.4 Article

PHYSICAL RESPONSE TO A SIMULATED PERIOD OF SOCCER-SPECIFIC FIXTURE CONGESTION

期刊

JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH
卷 33, 期 4, 页码 1075-1085

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002257

关键词

biomechanics; physiology; isokinetic; electromyography; PlayerLoad; recovery

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to assess the physiological, perceptual, and mechanical measures associated with the completion of a simulated period of short-term soccer-specific fixture congestion. Ten male semiprofessional soccer players completed 3 trials of a treadmill-based match simulation, with 48 hours interspersing each trial. A repeated measures general linear model identified significantly (p = 0.02) lower knee flexor peak torque (PT) recorded at 300 degrees.s(-1) in the second (141.27 +/- 28.51 N.m) and third trials (139.12 +/- 26.23 N.m) when compared with the first trial (154.17 +/- 35.25 N.m). Similarly, muscle soreness (MS) and PT data recorded at 60 degrees.s(-1) were significantly (p <= 0.05) different in the third trial (MS = 42 +/- 25 a.u; PT60 = 131.10 +/- 35.38 N.m) when compared with the first trial (MS = 29 +/- 29 a.u; PT60 = 145.61 +/- 42.86 N.m). Significant (p = 0.003) differences were also observed for mean electromyography (EMG(mean)) of bicep femoris between the third trial (T0-15 = 126.36 +/- 15.57 mu V; T75-90 = 52.18 +/- 17.19 mu V) and corresponding time points in the first trial (T0-15 = 98.20 +/- 23.49 mu V; T75-90 = 99.97 +/- 39.81 mu V). Cumulative increases in perceived exertion, heart rate, oxygen consumption, blood lactate concentrations, EMG(mean), and PlayerLoad (PL) were recorded across each trial. Muscle soreness and PT were also significantly different after trial. There were, however, no significant main effects or interactions for the salivary immunoglobulin A and the medial-lateral PL metrics. These data suggest a biomechanical and muscular emphasis with residual fatigue, with implications for injury risk and the development of recovery strategies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据