4.4 Article

EFFECTS OF CAFFEINE INGESTION ON SKILL PERFORMANCE DURING AN INTERNATIONAL FEMALE RUGBY SEVENS COMPETITION

期刊

JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH
卷 31, 期 12, 页码 3351-3357

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001763

关键词

women; team sports; ergogenic aids; doping

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to establish the effects of a caffeine-containing energy drink on skills and technical performance during a match in female elite rugby sevens players. On 2 nonconsecutive days of a friendly tournament, 16 women from the Spanish national rugby sevens team (mean age = 23 +/- 2 years) ingested 3 mg of caffeine per kilogram of body mass in the form of an energy drink or the same drink without caffeine (placebo drink). After 60 minutes for caffeine absorption, participants played 3 rugby sevens matches against another national team. Body impacts during the matches were assessed by triaxial accelerometers. The matches were videotaped, and each individual technical action was notated afterward by 2 experienced observers. In comparison with the placebo drink, the ingestion of the caffeinated energy drink increased the rate of body impacts in zone 1 (16.1 +/- 4.9 vs. 20.8 +/- 9.9 impacts/min, p < 0.05), zone 2 (12.2 +/- 10.6 vs. 16.2 +/- 15.2 impacts/min, p < 0.05), zone 3 (3.8 +/- 1.5 vs. 4.7 +/- 2.6 impacts/min, p < 0.05), and zone 5 (0.8 +/- 0.4 vs. 1.1 +/- 0.6 impacts/min, p < 0.05). The pre-exercise ingestion of the caffeinated energy drink did not affect the frequency or the quality of any rugby-specific technical actions during the games. In conclusion, the ingestion of 3 mg.kg(-1) of caffeine in the form of an energy drink increased the number of body impacts during a rugby sevens international competition which suggests a higher engagement of the players during the game. However, the caffeine ingestion did not influence the quality of the technical actions performed during the competition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据