4.6 Article

Outsourced privacy-preserving C4.5 decision tree algorithm over horizontally and vertically partitioned dataset among multiple parties

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10586-017-1019-9

关键词

Secure multiparty computation; Outsourced computation; C4; 5 decision tree; Privacy preserving data mining; PPWAP; SSIP

资金

  1. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2015AA016008]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61402136, 61472091]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China [2014A030313697]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province for Distinguished Young Scholars [2014A030306020]
  5. Guangzhou scholars project for universities of Guangzhou [1201561613]
  6. Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province, China [2015B01012 9015]
  7. Guangdong Province Key Laboratory of High Performance Computing [[2013]82]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Many companies want to share data for data-mining tasks. However, privacy and security concerns have become a bottleneck in the data-sharing field. The secure multiparty computation (SMC)-based privacy-preserving data mining has emerged as a solution to this problem. However, there is heavy computation cost at user side in traditional SMC solutions. This study introduces an outsourcing method to reduce the computation cost of the user side. We also preserve the privacy of the shared databy proposing an outsourced privacy-preserving C4.5 algorithm over horizontally and vertically partitioned data for multiple parties based on the outsourced privacy preserving weighted average protocol (OPPWAP) and outsourced secure set intersection protocol (OSSIP). Consequently, we have found that our method can achieve a result same the original C4.5 decision tree algorithm while preserving data privacy. Furthermore, we also implement the proposed protocols and the algorithms. It shows that a sublinear relationship exists between the computational cost of the user side and the number of participating parties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据