4.6 Review

Small intestinal submucosa: superiority, limitations and solutions, and its potential to address bottlenecks in tissue repair

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY B
卷 7, 期 33, 页码 5038-5055

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9tb00530g

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFC1104703]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31771042]
  3. State Key Laboratory of New Ceramic and Fine Processing Tsinghua University
  4. Fund of Key Laboratory of Advanced Materials of Ministry of Education (Tsinghua University)
  5. Sichuan Science and Technology Program [2019JDRC0020]
  6. 1.3.5 project for disciplines of excellence, West China Hospital, Sichuan University [ZYJC18002]
  7. International Joint Research Center of Aerospace Biotechnology and Medical Engineering, Ministry of Science and Technology of China
  8. 111 Project [B13003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Over the past few decades, small intestinal submucosa (SIS), a naturally occurring decellularized extracellular matrix (ECM), has attracted much attention in tissue repair because it can provide plentiful bioactive factors and a biomimetic three-dimensional microenvironment to induce desired cellular functions. In this article, the state-of-the-art research studies on SIS are reviewed, which are mainly centered on three aspects: (1) main superiority such as remarkable bioactivity, low immunogenicity, satisfactory resorbability and promising recellularization; (2) current efforts to overcome its limitations mainly focusing on reducing the naturally occurring heterogeneity, controlling the degradation rate and improving the mechanical properties; (3) great potential in solving the bottleneck problems encountered in repairing various tissues with particular emphasis on cardiovascular, urogenital, abdominal wall, skin, musculotendinous, gastrointestinal, vaginal, and bone tissues. In addition, future research trends are proposed in the conclusion and perspectives section.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据