4.3 Article

Robust multivariate control charts based on Birnbaum-Saunders distributions

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00949655.2017.1381699

关键词

Average run length; bootstrapping; Hotelling statistic; Mahalanobis distance; maximum likelihood method; Monte Carlo simulation; multivariate non-normal distributions; R software; C12; C13; C15; C16; Q53

资金

  1. Chilean Council for Scientific and Technology Research [FONDECYT 1160868]
  2. fellowship 'Becas-Conicyt'
  3. Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq)
  4. Brazilian Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Level Personnel (CAPES)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multivariate control charts are powerful and simple visual tools for monitoring the quality of a process. This multivariate monitoring is carried out by considering simultaneously several correlated quality characteristics and by determining whether these characteristics are in control or out of control. In this paper, we propose a robust methodology using multivariate quality control charts for subgroups based on generalized Birnbaum-Saunders distributions and an adapted Hotelling statistic. This methodology is constructed for Phases I and II of control charts. We estimate the corresponding parameters with the maximum likelihood method and use parametric bootstrapping to obtain the distribution of the adapted Hotelling statistic. In addition, we consider the Mahalanobis distance to detect multivariate outliers and use it to assess the adequacy of the distributional assumption. A Monte Carlo simulation study is conducted to evaluate the proposed methodology and to compare it with a standard methodology. This study reports the good performance of our methodology. An illustration with real-world air quality data of Santiago, Chile, is provided. This illustration shows that the methodology is useful for alerting early episodes of extreme air pollution, thus preventing adverse effects on human health.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据