4.8 Article

Monitoring the State-of-Charge of a Vanadium Redox Flow Battery with the Acoustic Attenuation Coefficient: An In Operando Noninvasive Method

期刊

SMALL METHODS
卷 3, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/smtd.201900494

关键词

acoustic attenuation; acoustic measurement; sound speed; state-of-charge; vanadium redox flow battery

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Electricity Energy Storage Program [57558]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Technology Transitions [TCF-17-13537]
  3. Laboratory Directed Research and Development Program at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
  4. DOE's Water Power Technologies Office
  5. DOE [DE-AC05-76RL01830]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Redox flow battery technology has been increasingly recognized as a promising option for large-scale grid energy storage. Access to high-fidelity information on the health status of the electrolyte, including the state-of-charge (SOC), is vital to maintaining optimal and economical battery operation. In this study, an ultrasonic probing cell that can be used to measure SOC in real time is designed. This unprecedented, new measurement approach overcomes the influence of varying temperatures by measuring the acoustic attenuation coefficient of the redox flow battery electrolyte online and noninvasively. The new approach is used to estimate the SOC of a vanadium redox flow battery in operando from measured acoustic properties. The accuracy of the SOC estimated from the acoustic properties is validated against SOC calculated by the titration method. The results show that the acoustic attenuation coefficient is a robust parameter for SOC monitoring, with a maximum error of 4.8% and extremely low sensitivity to temperature, while sound speed appears to be less accurate in the benchmark-inference method, with a maximum error of 22.5% and high sensitivity to temperature. The acoustic measurement approach has great potential for inexpensive real-time SOC monitoring of redox flow battery operations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据