4.7 Article

Immunomodulatory role of nonneuronal cholinergic signaling in myocardial injury

期刊

JCI INSIGHT
卷 4, 期 14, 页码 -

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.128961

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [R01 HL-58081, HL-73017-0, HL-089543-01]
  2. Center for Cardiovascular Research at Washington University School of Medicine
  3. S10 Shared Instrumentation Grant from the NIH

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Whereas prior studies have demonstrated an important immunomodulatory role for the neuronal cholinergic system in the heart, the role of the nonneuronal cholinergic system is not well understood. To address the immunomodulatory role of the nonneuronal cholinergic system in the heart, we used a previously validated diphtheria toxin-induced (DT-induced) cardiomyocyte ablation model (Rosa26-DTMlc2v-Cre mice). DT-injected Rosa26-DTMlc2v-Cre mice were treated with diluent or pyridostigmine bromide (PYR), a reversible cholinesterase inhibitor. PYR treatment resulted in increased survival and decreased numbers of MHC-II(lo)CCR2(+) macrophages in DT-injected Rosa26-DTMlc2v-Cre mice compared with diluent-treated Rosa26-DTMlc2v-Cre mice. Importantly, the expression of CCL2/7 mRNA and protein was reduced in the hearts of PYR-treated mice. Backcrossing Rosa26-DTMlc2v-Cre mice with a transgenic mouse line (Chat-ChR2) that constitutively overexpresses the vesicular acetylcholine transporter (VAChT) resulted in decreased expression of Ccl2/7 mRNA and decreased numbers of CD68(+) cells in DT-injured Rosa26-DTMlc2v-Cre/Chat-ChR2 mouse hearts, consistent with the pharmacologic studies with PYR. In vitro studies with cultures of LPS-stimulated peritoneal macrophages revealed a concentration-dependent reduction in CCL2 secretion following stimulation with acetylcholine, nicotine, and muscarine. To our knowledge, these findings reveal a previously unappreciated immunomodulatory role for the nonneuronal cholinergic system in regulating homeostatic responses in the heart following tissue injury.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据