4.5 Article

The Macroscope: A tool for examining the historical structure of language

期刊

BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS
卷 51, 期 4, 页码 1864-1877

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.3758/s13428-018-1177-6

关键词

Semantics; Language evolution; Language statistics; Word embedding

资金

  1. Bridges-Leverhulme Doctoral Training Centre scholarship
  2. EPSRC
  3. National University of Singapore Overseas Postdoctoral Fellowship
  4. Royal Society Wolfson Research Merit Award [WM160074]
  5. Alan Turing Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The recent rise in digitized historical text has made it possible to quantitatively study our psychological past. This involves understanding changes in what words meant, how words were used, and how these changes may have responded to changes in the environment, such as in healthcare, wealth disparity, and war. Here we make available a tool, the Macroscope, for studying historical changes in language over the last two centuries. The Macroscope uses over 155 billion words of historical text, which will grow as we include new historical corpora, and derives word properties from frequency-of-usage and co-occurrence patterns over time. Using co-occurrence patterns, the Macroscope can track changes in semantics, allowing researchers to identify semantically stable and unstable words in historical text and providing quantitative information about changes in a word's valence, arousal, and concreteness, as well as information about new properties, such as semantic drift. The Macroscope provides information about both the local and global properties of words, as well as information about how these properties change over time, allowing researchers to visualize and download data in order to make inferences about historical psychology. Although quantitative historical psychology represents a largely new field of study, we see this work as complementing a wealth of other historical investigations, offering new insights and new approaches to understanding existing theory. The Macroscope is available online at .

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据