4.5 Article

Elevated perseveration errors on a verbal fluency task in frequent nightmare recallers: a replication

期刊

JOURNAL OF SLEEP RESEARCH
卷 27, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jsr.12644

关键词

executive dysfunction; neurocognitive model; nightmares; perseveration; verbal fluency

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research grant
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada grant
  3. DreamScience Foundation Research Grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A recent study reported that individuals recalling frequent idiopathic nightmares (NM) produced more perseveration errors on a verbal fluency task than did control participants (CTL), while not differing in overall verbal fluency. Elevated scores on perseveration errors, an index of executive dysfunction, suggest a cognitive inhibitory control deficit in NM participants. The present study sought to replicate these results using a French-speaking cohort and French language verbal fluency tasks. A phonetic verbal fluency task using three stimulus letters (P, R, V) and a semantic verbal fluency task using two stimulus categories (female and male French first names) were administered to 23 participants with frequent recall of NM (2 NM per week, meanage=24.4 +/- 4.0years), and to 16 CTL participants with few recalled NM (1 NM per month, meanage=24.5 +/- 3.8years). All participants were French-speaking since birth and self-declared to be in good mental and physical health apart from their NM. As expected, groups did not differ in overall verbal fluency, i.e. total number of correct words produced in response to stimulus letters or categories (P=0.97). Furthermore, groups exhibited a difference in fluency perseveration errors, with the NM group having higher perseveration than the CTL group (P=0.03, Cohen's d=0.745). This replication suggests that frequent NM recallers have executive inhibitory dysfunction during a cognitive association task and supports a neurocognitive model which posits fronto-limbic impairment as a neural correlate of disturbed dreaming.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据