4.3 Article

Intravenous tranexamic acid reduces total blood loss in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective, double-blinded, randomized, controlled trial

期刊

JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY
卷 26, 期 8, 页码 1383-1389

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.01.005

关键词

tranexamic acid; antifibrinolytic; reverse total shoulder arthroplasty; blood loss; blood transfusion; prospective randomized trial

资金

  1. Biomet
  2. DePuy, a Johnson & Johnson Company

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Patients undergoing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) are at risk of significant perioperative blood loss. To date, few studies have examined the effectiveness of tranexamic acid (TXA) to reduce blood loss in the setting of RTSA. Methods: In a prospective, double-blinded, single-surgeon trial, we analyzed 102 patients undergoing primary RTSA who were randomized to receive intravenous TXA (n = 53) or placebo (n = 49). Calculated total blood loss, drain output, and hemoglobin (Hb) drop were measured. Postoperative transfusions were recorded. Complications were assessed out to 6 weeks postoperatively. Results: Total blood loss was less for the TXA group (1122.4 +/- 411.6 mL) than the placebo group (1472.6 +/- 475.4 mL, P < .001). Total drain output was less for the TXA group (221.4 +/- 126.2 mL) than the placebo group (371.9 +/- 166.3 mL, P < .001). Total Hb loss was less in the TXA group (154.57 +/- 60.29 g) compared with the placebo group (200.1 +/- 65.5 g, P = .001). Transfusion rates differed significantly at postoperative day 1; however, overall transfusion rates did not vary significantly. Seven patients (14.3%) and 12 units were transfused in the placebo group compared with 3 patients (5.7%) and 3 units in the TXA group. Discussion: In this cohort of patients undergoing primary RTSA, TXA was effective in reducing total drain output, total Hb loss, and total blood loss compared with a placebo control. (C) 2017 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据