3.8 Proceedings Paper

X-ray diffraction, Mossbauer spectroscopy, neutron diffraction, optical absorption and ab-initio calculation of magnetic process in orthorhombic YFexCr(1-x)O3 (0≤x≤1) compounds

期刊

HYPERFINE INTERACTIONS
卷 240, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG
DOI: 10.1007/s10751-019-1619-2

关键词

Combustion method; Preparation and characterization of YFexCr(1-x)O3 (0 <= x <= 1); Antiferromagnetism; Weak ferromagnetism; Mossbauer spectroscopy; Neutron powder diffraction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

YFexCr(1-x)O3 (0 <= x <= 1) compounds prepared by autocombustion were studied with X-ray and neutron powder diffraction, Mossbauer spectroscopy and ab-initio electronic structure calculations to try to understand the interplay of magnetic order and structural parameters as a function of doping in this multiferroic material. All samples exhibit the orthorhombic nuclear structure (space group symmetry Pnma) and the cell parameters vary continuously as a function of doping. In the neutron powder diffraction patterns it was observed that in addition to the Pnma nuclear structure peaks reflections are seen in all samples which arise from magnetic order. These peaks can be indexed using the nuclear unit cell indicating an ordering vector of k=(0,0,0). Using representational analysis and Rietveld refinements the magnetic structure was determined to be Pn'ma' and the mean magnetic moment per transition metal atom was observed to decrease continuously from Fe to Cr. For compounds with x>0.25 a weak ferromagnetic contribution is also present which is due to a small canting of the moments out of the basal plane. The Mossbauer spectra corroborate the NPD results with all samples showing single magnetic sextets at 4.2K. The energy gap and the main direct interband transition of the endmember samples were obtained by optical absorption measurements. These optical data were analyzed with the help of DFT band structure calculation using the GGA-PBE+U approximation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据