3.8 Article

Criteria of instability of copper and aluminium perfect crystals subjected to elastic deformation in the temperature range 0 - 400 K

期刊

LETTERS ON MATERIALS
卷 9, 期 3, 页码 265-269

出版社

RUSSIAN ACAD SCIENCES, INST METALS SUPERPLASTICITY PROBLEMS
DOI: 10.22226/2410-3535-2019-3-265-269

关键词

theoretical strength; stability criterion; copper; aluminum

资金

  1. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [17-02-00984]
  2. State assignment of IMSP RAS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polycrystalline metals have flow stress two to three orders of magnitude lower than the theoretical shear strength estimated by Frenkel model. This significant strength difference is primarily due to the presence of defects, such as dislocations and grain boundaries. However, it was experimentally found that defect-free nanoscale objects (whiskers, nanopillars, etc.) can exhibit strength close to the theoretical limit. With the development of nanotechnology, interest in the study of the theoretical strength of metals and alloys has grown significantly. It is important to find reliable criteria of lattice instability when homogeneous nucleation of defects begins during deformation of an ideal crystal lattice. Note that the Frenkel estimation does not take into account thermal vibrations of atoms and attempts are being made to take into account the effect of temperature on the theoretical strength of defect-free crystals. In this paper, using molecular dynamics simulation, we study shear deformation in the direction of (110[11 (2) over bar] for single crystals of copper and aluminum in the temperature range from 0 to 400 K. Lattice instability was evaluated using two criteria: (i) macroscopic criterion, which is related to the loss of positive definiteness of the stiffness tensor, and (ii) a microscopic criterion related to the formation of a stacking fault, which leads to a drop of the applied shear stress. It was demonstrated that both criteria are consistent at low temperatures, but the macroscopic criterion is less reliable at higher temperatures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据