4.3 Article

How Campers' Beliefs about Forest Pests Affect Firewood Transport Behavior: An Application of Involvement Theory

期刊

FOREST SCIENCE
卷 65, 期 3, 页码 363-372

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/forsci/fxy056

关键词

Agrilus planipennis; Anoplophora glabripennis; Asian longhorned beetle; emerald ash borer; firewood movement

类别

资金

  1. Maine Department of Agriculture, Conservation, and Forestry
  2. USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture McIntire-Stennis project through the Maine Agricultural and Forest Experiment Station [ME041707]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We conducted a survey of 272 campers at 18 private and public ampgrounds in Maine (n = 101), New Hampshire (n = 88), and Vermont (n = 83) to learn about their firewood movement behavior, and knowledge and beliefs about invasive forest pests. More than 25 percent of respondents reported that they often or always brought firewood from home for camping. Most (92 percent) had heard of invasive forest pests, but <25 percent could name an example without being prompted, affirming a need for increasing exposure of outreach materials to facilitate activation of attitudes associated with forest pests and transport of firewood. Campers provided helpful suggestions to improve current outreach and education efforts such as illustrating more of the detrimental impacts forest pests have on trees near homes or recreation areas. For campers who believe their wood is safe and therefore okay to transport regardless of regulations, a need exists to re-message arguments. Furthermore, results suggest that some campers with low involvement who are less engaged and less inclined to seek out information may additionally need more direct approaches. Actions to better capture the attention of these campers could potentially include confiscating illegally transported firewood at check stations, issuing warnings, or administering fines for moving nonlocal or nonheat-treated firewood in order to obtain compliance with protective firewood regulations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据