4.6 Review

Review of moraine dam failure mechanism

期刊

GEOMATICS NATURAL HAZARDS & RISK
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 1948-1966

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/19475705.2019.1652210

关键词

Moraine dam; glacial lake outburst floods; failure mechanism; ice avalanche; experimental investigations; climate change

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41520104002, 41661144028]
  2. Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences, CAS [QYZDY-SSW-DQC006]
  3. 135 Strategic Program of the Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, CAS [SDS-135-1701]
  4. Foundation of Youth Innovation Promotion Association, Chinese Academy of Sciences [2017425]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Moraine dams, impounding glacial lakes, are among the weak natural dams because of their slope, freeboard and composition. Glacial lake outburst floods occurring due to the failure of moraine dams are significant hazards for the valley downstream the failure, as they possess huge amount of hydraulic energy that can kill thousands and destroy infrastructures and riverine landscape. Also, the entrainment of debris to the flow from the breaching process and downstream channel may develop the flow into a much bigger disaster or even a series of hazard chain. Ice and rock avalanche or landslide, glacier calving, degradation of ice cores, earthquake and atmospheric events trigger the breaching phenomenon which generates a series of waves overtopping the dam or seepage causing the failure of the dam. Various approaches have been discussed in this review paper to produce an understanding of the failure mechanism of moraine dams: experimental works, empirical relationships, analytical solutions, and numerical modelling. No concrete experimental investigations and parametric solutions pertained to the failure mechanism of moraine dam is found in the review, but various empirical relationships are discussed and suitable approaches for numerical modelling are suggested as per the requirement of the task.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据