4.5 Article

Aminosilanized magnetic carbon microspheres for the magnetic solid-phase extraction of bisphenol A, bisphenol AF, and tetrabromobisphenol A from environmental water samples

期刊

JOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE
卷 40, 期 8, 页码 1755-1764

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.201601228

关键词

aminosilanized magnetic carbon microspheres; bisphenols; liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry; magnetic solid-phase extraction

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21477068, 21407099]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2015YL003]
  3. Key Research and Development Program of Shandong Province [2015GSF117011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aminosilanized magnetic carbon microspheres as a novel adsorbent were designed and fabricated. The adsorbent was used for the magnetic solid-phase extraction of bisphenols at trace levels from environmental water samples before liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry analysis. The structure, surface, and magnetic behavior of the as-prepared aminosilanized magnetic carbon microspheres were characterized by elemental analysis, scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, powder X-ray diffraction, and vibrating sample magnetometry. The effects of the experimental parameters were investigated by the Plackett-Burman design, and then the parameters that were significant to the extraction efficiencies were optimized through a response surface methodology. The aminosilanized magnetic carbon microspheres exhibited high adsorption efficiency and selectivity for bisphenols. Under optimal conditions, low limits of detection (0.011-2.22 ng/L), and a wide linear range (2-3 orders of magnitude), good repeatability (4.7-7.8%, n = 5), and reproducibility (6.0-8.3%, n = 3) were achieved. The results demonstrate that the novel adsorbent possesses great potentials in the determination of trace levels of bisphenols in environmental water samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据