4.5 Article

Chiral separation of 12 pairs of enantiomers by capillary electrophoresis using heptakis-(2,3-diacetyl-6-sulfato)-β-cyclodextrin as the chiral selector and the elucidation of the chiral recognition mechanism by computational methods

期刊

JOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE
卷 40, 期 14, 页码 2999-3007

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.201700137

关键词

capillary electrophoresis; computational calculations; cyclodextrin; enantioseparation; single-isomer cyclodextrins

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81273476, J1210029]
  2. Fund for long-term training of young teachers in Shenyang Pharmaceutical University [ZQN2015002]
  3. Training Program Foundation for the Distinguished Young Scholars of University in Liaoning Province [LJQ2015109]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chiral separation of 12 pairs of basic analyte enantiomers including oxybutynin, bambuterol, tradinterol, clenbuterol, clorprenaline, terbutaline, tulobuterol, citalopram, phencynonate, fexofenadine, salbutamol, and penehyclidine was conducted by capillary electrophoresis using a single-isomer anionic beta-cyclodextrin derivative, heptakis(2,3-diacetyl-6-sulfato)-beta-cyclodextrin as the chiral selector. Parameters influencing separation were studied, including background electrolyte pH, heptakis-(2,3-diacetyl-6-sulfato)-beta-cyclodextrin concentration, buffer concentration, and separation voltage. A background electrolyte consisting of 50 mM Tris-H3PO4 and 6 mM heptakis( 2,3-diacetyl-6-sulfato)-beta-cyclodextrin at pH 2.5 was found to be highly efficient for the separation of most enantiomers, with other conditions of normal polarity mode at 10 kV, detection wavelength of 210 nm using hydrodynamic injection for 3 s. Under the optimal conditions, baseline resolution (>1.50) for 11 pairs of enantiomers and somewhat lower resolution for penehyclidine enantiomers (1.17) were generated. Moreover, the possible mechanism of separation of clenbuterol, oxybutynin, salbutamol, and penehyclidine was investigated using a computational modeling method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据