4.5 Article

Magnetic N-doped mesoporous carbon as an adsorbent for the magnetic solid-phase extraction of phthalate esters from soft drinks

期刊

JOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE
卷 40, 期 8, 页码 1637-1643

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.201601262

关键词

High-performance liquid chromatography; magnetic solid-phase extraction; phthalate esters; porous carbon

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31471643, 31571925, 31671930]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province [B2016204136, B2016204146, B2017204025]
  3. Hebei Double First Class Discipline Construction Foundation for the Discipline of Food Science and Engineering of Hebei Agricultural University [2016SPGCA18]
  4. Scientific and Technological Research Foundation of the Department of Education of Hebei Province [ZD2016085]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new kind of magnetic N-doped mesoporous carbon was prepared by the one-step carbonization of a hybrid precursor (glucose, melamine, and iron chloride) in a N-2 atmosphere with a eutectic salt (KCl/ZnCl2) as the porogen. The obtained magnetic N-doped mesoporous carbon showed excellent characteristics, such as strong magnetic response, high surface area, large pore volume, and abundant p-electron system, which endow it with a great potential as a magnetic solid-phase extraction adsorbent. To evaluate its adsorption performance, the magnetic N-doped mesoporous carbon was used for the extraction of three phthalate esters from soft drink samples followed by high-performance liquid chromatographic analysis. Under the optimum conditions, the developed method showed a good linearity (1.0-120.0 ng/mL), low limit of detection (0.1-0.3 ng/mL, S/N = 3), and good recoveries (83.2-119.0%) in soft drink samples. The results indicated that the magnetic N-doped mesoporous carbon has an excellent adsorption capacity for phthalate esters and the present method is simple, accurate, and highly efficient for the extraction and determination of phthalate esters in complex matrix samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据