4.7 Article

Energy and carbon footprints of food: Investigating the effect of cooking

期刊

SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION
卷 19, 期 -, 页码 44-52

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2019.03.003

关键词

Cooking energy; Greenhouse gas emissions; Mass gains and losses; Nutrient delivery footprints; Life cycle inventories

资金

  1. federal institution Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas (CONICET), Argentina
  2. Universidad Nacional del Comahue, Argentina [PIN I B191]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Energy and carbon footprints of foods are of much concern, since food systems account for nearly one third of energy use and Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions worldwide. Due to the complexity of mass variations in food processing and the diversity of appliances used in household cooking, most studies on energy and carbon footprints were performed from cradle to farm gate or wholesale stages. However, life cycle studies considering food preparation are important to assess environmental impacts related to both consumer practices and food characteristics. In the present work, we performed an experimental study that involved cooking of 18 foods consumed in Argentina; we report the energy consumption, GHG emissions and mass changes associated with the process. We also defined a nutritional footprint indicator, which allowed us to obtain the energy use and GHG emissions per unit of nutrient content instead of per unit of weight (e.g. per kg of food). We studied the cases of beef, wheat-based bread and soybeans, which represent the three analyzed food groups, to assess the impact of cooking on the cradle-to-table energy and carbon footprint. Our results showed that the relative impact of including the cooking stage in the energy and carbon footprints depends on the analyzed food item, with the impact being more important for plant-based than for meat products. Thus, a reduction in the footprint gap between plant-based and animal-based foods was found. (C) 2019 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据