4.1 Article

How Schools Can Promote Healthy Development for Newly Arrived Immigrant and Refugee Adolescents: Research Priorities

期刊

JOURNAL OF SCHOOL HEALTH
卷 87, 期 2, 页码 121-132

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/josh.12477

关键词

immigrants; immigrant youth; refugees; refugee youth; adolescent health; school success

资金

  1. University of Tennessee Center for the Study of Youth and Political Conflict
  2. University of Tennessee Center for Health Policy and Research
  3. University of Tennessee Department of Public Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUNDThe US education system must find creative and effective ways to foster the healthy development of the approximately 2million newly arrived immigrant and refugee adolescents, many of whom contend with language barriers, limited prior education, trauma, and discrimination. We identify research priorities for promoting the school success of these youth. METHODSThe study used the 4-phase priority-setting method of the Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative. In the final stage, 132 researchers, service providers, educators, and policymakers based in the United States were asked to rate the importance of 36 research options. RESULTSThe highest priority research options (range 1 to 5) were: evaluating newcomer programs (mean=4.44, SD=0.55), identifying how family and community stressors affect newly arrived immigrant and refugee adolescents' functioning in school (mean=4.40, SD=0.56), identifying teachers' major stressors in working with this population (mean=4.36, SD=0.72), and identifying how to engage immigrant and refugee families in their children's education (mean=4.35, SD=0.62). CONCLUSIONThese research priorities emphasize the generation of practical knowledge that could translate to immediate, tangible benefits for schools. Funders, schools, and researchers can use these research priorities to guide research for the highest benefit of schools and the newly arrived immigrant and refugee adolescents they serve.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据