4.5 Article

Deducing the stage of origin of Wilms' tumours from a developmental series of Wt1-mutant mice

期刊

DISEASE MODELS & MECHANISMS
卷 8, 期 8, 页码 903-U271

出版社

COMPANY OF BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/dmm.018523

关键词

WT1; Wilms' tumour; Kidney development; Mouse model

资金

  1. EuReGene
  2. EU [05085]
  3. Olson trust
  4. National Center for Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research [94808]
  5. Association for International Cancer Research [04-297]
  6. MRC grant [MR/K010735/1]
  7. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) [BB/J004316/1]
  8. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBS/E/D/20221657] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. Medical Research Council [MC_PC_U127527180, MR/M010341/1, MC_PC_U127527203, MR/K010735/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC3Rs) [NC/K500549/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  11. BBSRC [BBS/E/D/20221657] Funding Source: UKRI
  12. MRC [MR/K010735/1, MC_PC_U127527180, MC_PC_U127527203, MR/M010341/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Wilms' tumours, paediatric kidney cancers, are the archetypal example of tumours caused through the disruption of normal development. The genetically best-defined subgroup of Wilms' tumours is the group caused by biallelic loss of the WT1 tumour suppressor gene. Here, we describe a developmental series of mouse models with conditional loss of Wt1 in different stages of nephron development before and after the mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition (MET). We demonstrate that Wt1 is essential for normal development at all kidney developmental stages under study. Comparison of genome-wide expression data from the mutant mouse models with human tumour material of mutant or wild-type WT1 datasets identified the stage of origin of human WT1-mutant tumours, and emphasizes fundamental differences between the two human tumour groups due to different developmental stages of origin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据