3.8 Proceedings Paper

Nano-emulsion from Capsaicin: Formulation and Characterization

期刊

MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS
卷 18, 期 -, 页码 869-878

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.06.517

关键词

Analgesics; Capsaicin; FT-IR; MTT assay; Nano-emulsion; Neuro-2a cell lines

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Capsaicin, abundantly found in hot chilli peppers is reported to have variety of pharmacological effects such as effective role in pain control and can be used as an effective analgesic agent. In the present work, capsaicin extracts were prepared using liquid-liquid extraction technique and solid-liquid extraction techniques. The extracts were then characterized via qualitative and quantitative tests, Thin Layer Chromatography and High Performance Liquid Chromatography. Plant extracts from dried chillies showed better yields and higher alkaloid and capsaicinoids contents as compared to fresh capsaicin extracts. Clear, uniform & stable oil-in-water nano-emulsions of capsaicin were prepared using Oleic acid/Labrasol, Tween-20, glycerol and water using high-speed homogenizer & ultra-sonicator. The developed capsaicin nano-emulsion was characterized for particle size, PDI & zeta potential. The particle size of capsaicin-loaded nano-emulsion (oleic acid) was found to be 35.95 nm with PDI of 0.320 and 7.902 nm with PDI of 0.168 with labrasol basesd nanoemulsion. The zeta potential was determined to be -18.5 mV. Refractive index of optimized nanoemulsion was observed to be 1.33 +/- 0.01 with a pH 6.1 +/- 0.05. Percentage transmittance suggested clear nanoemulsion (99 +/- 0.5 % transmittance) with conductivity of 119.5 +/- 1.5 mu S/cm. Further cytotoxicity was evaluated on Neuro-2a cell using MTT assay. The reported C-max values of capsaicin from topical route is 17.8 ng/ml, results of Cell viability indicated 80% cells to be viable with nano-emulsion prepared from capsaicin at 125 ng/ml and 12.5 ng/ml, which well covers the reported C-max values. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据