4.5 Article

Transition from chain-to crystal-network in extension induced crystallization of isotactic polypropylene

期刊

JOURNAL OF RHEOLOGY
卷 61, 期 4, 页码 589-599

出版社

JOURNAL RHEOLOGY AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1122/1.4982703

关键词

-

资金

  1. Key research and development tasks of MOST [2016YFB0302501]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51633009, 51325301, 51227801]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With a combination of extensional rheology and in-situ small-angle X-ray scattering measurements, the protocol of two-step extension is proposed to investigate the early stage of flow-induced crystallization (FIC) in supercooled isotactic polypropylene melt at 138 degrees C. After both step strains, the crystallization half-time presents a nonmonotonic dependence on the interval time between two extensional operations, based on which three different stages of structural evolution are defined. In stage I, both nucleation and chain relaxation occur, which enhances the crystallization rate but reduces the final lamellar crystal orientation. In this stage, each part of the melt is considered to have approximately the same dynamics to respond homogeneously to the second extension and thus the system is still dominated by a chain-network. When entering into stage II, the sparse large-scaled crystal is formed to construct a heterogeneous crystal-network superimposed on the chain-network, which decelerates the second extension induced crystallization by causing stress concentration on the crystal-network at low faction. In stage III, the crystal-network dominates the sample deformation due to the formation of abundant lamellar crystal, which recreates the approximately same dynamics for each part of sample and brings about an enhancement of crystallization rate again. The transition from chain-to crystal-network revealed in this work demonstrates a dynamical coupling of chain relaxation, crystal nucleation, and growth in FIC of polymers. (C) 2017 The Society of Rheology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据