4.1 Article Proceedings Paper

Isolation and characterization of the human ovarian cell population for transplantation into an artificial ovary

期刊

ANIMAL REPRODUCTION
卷 16, 期 1, 页码 39-44

出版社

BRAZILIAN COLL ANIMAL REPRODUCTION
DOI: 10.21451/1984-3143-AR2018-0140

关键词

artificial ovary; cell isolation; endothelial cells; stromal cells

资金

  1. Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique de Belgique (FNRS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To support survival and growth of follicles, the transplantable artificial ovary should mimic the original organ, offering a physical (3D matrix) and biological support (cells). In order to replicate the ovarian cell populations, the aim of this study is to assess the proportions of stromal and endothelial cells in the ovarian cortex. To this end, ovarian biopsies were obtained from six women (mean age: 49 years). The epithelial layer and medulla were carefully removed. The cortex was finely minced and enzymatically digested and the isolated cells were fixed. For cell characterization, immunostaining for CD31 (for endothelial cells) and inhibin-a (for granulosa cells) was performed. Positive cells in each staining were counted and the proportion of the different cell populations was estimated from the total number of isolated cells. Since there is no specific marker for ovarian stromal cells, we estimated the proportion of these cells by performing a vimentin immunostaining and subtracting the proportions of CD31-and inhibin-a-positive cells. Immunostaining showed that 84% of isolated cells were vimentin-positive. From this pool, 3% were endothelial cells and 1% granulosa cells. Consequently, the population of ovarian stromal cells was 80%. In conclusion, our findings show that stromal cells represent the larger population of cells in the human ovarian cortex. While this ensures follicle survival and development in a normal ovary, we believe that the low proportion of endothelial cells could have a negative impact on the angiogenesis in the artificial ovary after the first days of transplantation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据